This is from their discussion of regimes of signs, and the endless chains of signifiers, in which signs refer only to other signs (words defined only by words, defined by words, etc., e.g. I'm not sure if they actually used the term "IRS" in the original French, or if they used the French government's equivalent). Then later, in their chapter on Faciality:
"Earlier, we encountered two axes, signifiance and subjectification. We saw that they were two very different semiotic systems, or even two strata. Signifiance is never without a white wall upon which it inscribes its signs and redundancies. Subjectification is never without a black hole in which it lodges its consciousness, passion, and redundancies. Since all semiotics are mixed and strata come at least in twos, it should come as no surprise that a very special mechanism is situated at their intersection. Oddly enough, it is a face: the white wall/black hole system. A broad face with white cheeks, a chalk face with eyes cut in for a black hole. Clown head, white clown, moon-white mime, angel of death, Holy Shroud." (Ibid., 167, emphasis theirs.)
And a little later in the same section:
"The face is not a universal. It is not even that of the white man; it is White Man himself, with his broad white cheeks and teh black hole of his eyes. The face is Christ.... Jesus Christ superstar." (Ibid., 176)
No comments:
Post a Comment